No More Select
Thank you NYTimes...
Thanks for freeing up the op-ed pieces and the archived articles of your great writers.
Although the announcement has not been issued, Holly Sanders of the NYPost has reported that the Times will be removing the restrictions established from their TimesSelect service.
On the media sales front, yes, you may not the same segments of highly targetable users. Yet, this move should be solid for more targeted page views and larger ad inventory. On the subscription front, I thought this statistic was interesting.
"The number of Web-only subscribers who pay $7.95 a month or $49.95 a year fell to just over 221,000 in June, down from more than 224,000 in April."
That stat may prove that there are still solid sources of online journalism available, and the decreases in readership from offering subscriptions may not be worth it in the long run.
The next question is when the WSJ will open up?
On my end, you'll see more links to the Times again.
Feed that Head,
IronDog
Thanks for freeing up the op-ed pieces and the archived articles of your great writers.
Although the announcement has not been issued, Holly Sanders of the NYPost has reported that the Times will be removing the restrictions established from their TimesSelect service.
On the media sales front, yes, you may not the same segments of highly targetable users. Yet, this move should be solid for more targeted page views and larger ad inventory. On the subscription front, I thought this statistic was interesting.
"The number of Web-only subscribers who pay $7.95 a month or $49.95 a year fell to just over 221,000 in June, down from more than 224,000 in April."
That stat may prove that there are still solid sources of online journalism available, and the decreases in readership from offering subscriptions may not be worth it in the long run.
The next question is when the WSJ will open up?
On my end, you'll see more links to the Times again.
Feed that Head,
IronDog
Labels: NYTimes adsales
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home